However, despite these potential benefits, Turkish Stream also presents a real problem for Europe.
By providing an alternative route for Russian natural gas heading to Europe that circumvents Ukraine, it would give Russian the ability to diminish Ukraine as a transit state with great importance.
The Kremlin would have a way to cut off supplies to Ukraine without cutting off the rest of Europe, lowering the political cost to Moscow of leveraging natural gas to gain sway over Kiev, the Stratfor analysts warned.
In response to this concern, the Energy Union Package the European Union unveiled on February clearly laid out plans to involve Ukraine in any future European energy market.
This would effectively entwine the fates of the European and Ukrainian energy sectors.
By increasing the infrastructure connecting Ukraine to Europe and placing Ukraine under the umbrella of EU legislation, the continent would be able to send natural gas piped through TurkStream on to Ukraine.
Although Brussels probably will not seek to incentivize the Turkish Stream, it also likely will not stand in the way of the pipeline`s construction, so long as Russia adheres to the Third Energy Package, the Stratfor report concluded.
More about:
